Why Was There No Concern By Democrats When Clinton Phones Were Destroyed With Hammers?

Click onto any highlighted word to see the videos and text on the blog.

CNN Stunned When Fact Checkers Confirm Clinton Phones Destroyed With Hammers.

As U.S. citizens, all of our rights are in danger due to a lack of “equal justice under the law,” as we see in the facts of this post.

This post is an extract of information from a post of November 2, 2016.

Clinton Phones Destroyed With Hammers. Other Clinton Information.

Can any reasonable person explain why Hillary Clinton would have 13 Blackberries and 5 iPads destroyed?

Here is a question for all of you military and ex-military people. What would have happened to you if you had taken classified information away from a secured environment and have someone who did not have a security clearance have access to that information, such as what happened when a private company installed the personal server of Hillary Clinton in her home?

Consider the videos and the explanation of classifications of Top Secret, Secret, and Confidential information. All such classifications show that any disclosure of such, are a danger to the security of our nation. The ongoing investigation of Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with her bid to become President, but is an attempt to determine whether a federal crime has been committed. Justice has no wrist watch or calendar. Hillary Clinton, and her media and Democrat party supporters, will continue to try to spin the FBI investigation into a direction that is not true. It appears that no one in the Democrat party political process is interested in justice being found in this matter.

Never has a candidate for the office of President come under FBI investigation. The Democrat Party, and its super delegates, gave us such a candidate for President, as they did in Hillary. Of course, political Democrats do not care that Hillary Clinton supports the abortion of unborn babies, up until the time of birth. She supports same-sex marriage, to the extent that everyone must not only accept such an abomination, but must embrace it. Not a single political Democrat has spoken out against using the force of law to allow men to go into bathrooms where women and little girls may also be, at the same time. Check the links of this post to see Hillary’s opinions of men being able to go into the bathrooms of little girls, women, any kind of female.

SHAME ON ANY MOTHER, FATHER, CHRISTIAN, JEW, OR ANY PERSON, WHO WOULD WANT HILLARY TO BE OUR PRESIDENT!

Why would anyone want to vote for a Presidential candidate who sees nothing wrong with men going into Womens’ restrooms. Also, no other political democrat has spoken out against the decree of President Obama which made this situation a problem.

If you are a parent, a democrat parent, why do you find nothing wrong with letting a man go into the rest room where your little girl may be, at the same time? There is something terribly wrong that has happened to the Democrat party, and its political leaders, who see nothing wrong with such perverted laws? This statement is directed to people who say that they are Christians, who say that they know Jesus as their Lord and Savior, who say that they have been born again and have the Spirit of Christ dwelling within their spirit. Here is a fact of such a born again experience. If a person has God’s Holy Spirit dwelling within their spirit, they have a non-stop prompting of the Holy Spirit to us to righteousness. See the words of John 16:7-11.

No one who has the Spirit of God dwelling within their spirit, and prompting them to righteousness, can support the democrat party, or any of its candidates, because of that party’s support for killing unborn babies, for supporting homosexual marriage, or for supporting laws that make it possible for men to lawfully enter the restrooms of women and little girls. There is no one who should be surprised that the Democrat party supports abortion on demand, same-sex marriage, and using federal law to allow men to go into the restrooms of women and little girls. Here is a direct statement to anyone who claims to be a born again believer in Jesus, yet still plans on voting for Hillary Clinton, or any other Democrat, Your vote will be a vote to kill unborn babies; your vote will be a vote for forcing our country to not only accept homosexual marriage, but to embrace it; your vote will be a vote to use the force of law to allow men to go into the restrooms of women and little girls. “If you claim to be a born again believer in Jesus, and still vote for democrat candidates, that is evidence that you have not been born again, and have the Great White Throne Judgment awaiting you”. This election, is an indictment against such fence-sitting Christians (so-called). My plea is for such fence-sitters to get right with God. Don’t just say that you have been born again.

John 16:7-11 New King James Version (NKJV)

7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. 8 And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 of sin, because they do not believe in Me; 10 of righteousness, because I go to My Father and you see Me no more; 11 of judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.

Revelation 20:15 New King James Version (NKJV)

15 And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.

Now, consider the evidence against voting for Hillary Clinton, or any other democrat.

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Hillary-Clinton-transgender-bathroom-North-Carolina/2016/09/27/id/750456/

Hillary Slams NC Governor Over Bathroom Bill

http://www.clinton.news/2016-05-24-clinton-throws-support-behind-obama-admin-and-transgender-favoring-bathroom-legislation.html
Clinton Throws Support Behind Obama Admin And Transgender-Favoring Bathroom Legislation

http://www.advocate.com/election/2016/3/25/clinton-sanders-slam-north-carolinas-transphobic-law
Clinton, Sanders Slam North Carolina’s Transphobic Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._security_clearance_terms

Security levels[edit]

Security clearances can be issued by many United States of America government agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security(DHS), the Department of Energy (DoE), the Department of Justice (DoJ), the National Security Agency (NSA), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). DoD issues more than 80% of all clearances. There are three levels of DoD security clearances:[1]
TOP SECRET – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
SECRET – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
CONFIDENTIAL – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security.

ABORTION AND CLINTON AND DEMOCRATS

Consider the following link that shows the number of babies that have been aborted by Planned Parenthood during the Obama administration. Hillary says that she will continue the Obama agenda.

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/08/during-the-obama-admin-planned-parenthood-has-aborted-nearly-2000000-babies/

During Obama Admin, Planned Parenthood Has Aborted Nearly 2,000,000 Babies

Democrats, “all political democrats,” support abortion on demand. If you have “the stomach for it,” check the following videos that show the abortion procedure. I have not shown the links, so that they will not automatically be shown on your screen. But, the videos should be seen. They will show you just how far our the democrat party has moved toward the butcher mindset that prevailed against Jews by Nazi Germany during World War II, when six million Jews were also murdered.

Since democrats, including Hillary, see nothing wrong with abortion, which is the butchering of an unborn baby, check out the video of a “late term abortion, which is known as “LEGRADO.” You will see the democrat party’s perverted way of thinking, as it relates to life and death. The video is a very graphic view of an abortion, and should be seen for you to know the brutality of abortion. The link can be found at the bottom of the page.

Voters, it is important to understand the seriousness of this election. If a democrat is voted into any public office, that person will support the Democrat Party platform of abortion on demand, for any reason, at any time, up until the time of birth. To not vote for a republican, any republican, will have the same result as voting for a democrat. In 2008, our nation elected a Democrat President, House Of Representatives, and U.S. Senate. In essence, our nation was led by people who showed no evidence of having a personal relationship with Christ. Hillary Clinton shows no evidence that she has a born-again relationship with Christ. Such a lack of born-again experience will affect her ability to lead our nation in the direction of righteousness. The result of her being our President will be that of more unborn babies being murdered in the wombs of their mothers. We must keep Hillary and all other democrats out of office. God will not continue to allow our nation to take the lives of innocent little unborn babies. We must understand the words of God in 2 Chronicles 7:14. That is our nation’s only defense against God’s punishment on our country.

2 Chronicles 7:14 New King James Version (NKJV)

14 if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

Disclaimer. I am not a registered Republican. I grew up in a Democrat home. My father belonged to a union and walked picked lines. I have also belonged to unions.

LEGRADO

Three CNN Employees Resign Over Retracted Russia Story

Click onto any highlighted word to see the video and text on the blog.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/stevenperlberg/three-cnn-employees-resign-over-retracted-russia-story?utm_term=.nllaBZJwa#.mvdNgwBAN

Three CNN Employees Resign Over Retracted Russia Story
Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Haris have resigned in the wake of the story.

Posted on June 26, 2017, at 6:44 p.m.
Steven Perlberg
BuzzFeed News Reporter

Jason Kempin / Getty Images
Three CNN employees have resigned in the wake of the news outlet’s retracted Russia story.

Thomas Frank, the reporter who wrote the story; Eric Lichtblau, who recently joined CNN from the New York Times; and CNN Investigates executive editor Lex Haris have left the news outlet. The Washington Post first reported the resignations, which a CNN source confirmed to BuzzFeed News.

“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” CNN said in a statement.

The deleted story, which cited a single unnamed source, claimed that the Senate Intelligence Committee was eyeing a “$10 billion Russian investment fund whose chief executive met with a member of President Donald Trump’s transition team four days before Trump’s inauguration.”

The story, written by investigative reporter Frank, was posted on Thursday and deleted late Friday. More than an hour after BuzzFeed News contacted CNN about the deletion, an editor’s note appeared on CNN website saying that the story “did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted.”

The note also apologized to Anthony Scaramucci, a member of Trump’s orbit who had been named in the story (and who later tweeted that the apology was accepted).

The retraction sent CNN scrambling to deal with the fallout over the weekend, even within parts of the news operation that weren’t involved in the retracted report. On Saturday, CNNMoney executive editor Rich Barbieri sent a note to staffers saying that nobody should publish any content involving Russia without coming first to him and another CNN vice president, according to the email, which was obtained by BuzzFeed News.

Sources close to the network said that CNN Worldwide President Jeff Zucker was involved with the internal investigation into the story’s handling.

Steven Perlberg is a media and politics reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in New York. His PGP fingerprint is 0ACB FA3B AC49 D43C 79C4 8DE5 3C06 7521 F4EC 3AA5

Contact Steven Perlberg at steven.perlberg@buzzfeed.com.

Considering Clinton Foundation Caught With $1M in Undocumented Funds From Qatar

Click onto any highlighted word to see the video and text on the blog.

Many apologies to Gypsies – Should the words have been, “Clintons, Obamas, Holder, Lynch, Pelosi, Schumer, Reid, other such Democrats, liberal fake media, et al?” “Honest” Americas will decide.

Please take time to read the links of this post. There has been a great attempt to take away the freedoms of the USA that we have enjoyed for 241 years. There has been an unending attempt to take God (Elohim) out of our country. There has been an attempt to force normal Americans to, not only, accept abortion on demand and homosexuality, but to embrace such ungodly abominations. Too many people, who say that they know Christ as their Lord and Savior, continue to vote for Democrats…the party that supports abortion on demand and homosexuality and has those ungodly lifestyles on their party platform. Many thanks to “Reclaiming Our Republic” for its post on this subject, from which the ideas of this post were gathered.

https://cchurchchurchblog.wordpress.com/2017/06/27/clinton-foundation-caught-with-1m-in-undocumented-funds-from-qatar/

Clinton Foundation Caught With $1M in Undocumented Funds From Qatar
Posted on June 25, 2017 by ror1774

June 23, 2017 by Andrew West

From the moment Hillary Clinton announced her candidacy for President years ago, her handlers must have understood what a lost cause it would be.

Clinton, who is an absolutely filthy politician known for corruption over anything else, was about to be under the microscope in ways that only a presidential candidate could be. Every nook and cranny of the skeletons in her closet would be picked apart, bone by bone, and reassembled nightly on the network news. There were the obvious topics to discuss: Benghazi, her vote on the Iraq war, and a myriad of other scandals would be revisited, tenfold, as she prepared to face Donald Trump in the general election.

In an incredible twist of fate, the world was able to dig even deeper than ever before into the grimy world of Clintonian politics thanks to a treasure trove of Hillary campaign emails being delivered to anonymous whistleblower website Wikileaks. These disclosures would ultimately contribute to Hillary’s embracing electoral defeat, as they were both extremely profound and incredibly damaging.

One such subject addressed after this massive leak was a clandestine channel used by the Clintons to trade small fortunes for time with then-Secretary of State Hillary. This pay-to-play scheme within the Clinton Foundation still stands as one of the most egregious abuses of American governmental power for which no one was ever indicted. In the midst of all of these backdoor deals, the Clinton Foundation apparently took in a pile of cash from Qatar that was never reported…until now.

“Among the thousands of emails hacked from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman John Podesta and published by Wikileaks, one stated that officials from the government of Qatar gave the Clinton Foundation $1 million to celebrate Bill Clinton’s 65th birthday, funds which the foundation did not report to the State Department.

“That would seemingly violate an ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed when she became Secretary of State in 2009, in which she promised the foundation would notify the State Department’s ethics official if a new foreign government wanted to donate or ‘increase materially’ its contributions.

“Clinton Foundation spokesman Brian Cookstra told Reuters that the $1 million gift was not a ‘material increase’ in Qatar’s contributions. But Qatar had given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation in total, meaning the $1 million gift represented between a 20% to 100% increase.”

This is just one of many such instances in which the Clintons completely swindled the American people.

The source of these leaks that have provided us with a clear representation of the vast voraciousness of the Clinton crime family is thought to have been Seth Rich, a DNC staffer that was mysteriously murdered shortly after being identified as a possible suspect in the leak. Like many of Clinton’s enemies, Seth’s murder was under investigated, and lead to conclusions that even the most brainwashed liberals are having difficulties dismissing.

http://constitution.com/clinton-foundation-caught-1m-undocumented-funds-qatar/

Democrat Mish-Mash – Obama To Trump: “Stop Whining” About A Rigged Election

“Democrat Mish-Mash”

Obama To Trump: “Stop Whining” About A Rigged Election

Oh! How words are changed to fit, or attempt to fix, the situation!

Our former President said that US elections can’t be rigged.
Our former President said that the results of the presidential election should be respected and accepted.

Read some of the following You Tube comments

Published on Oct 18, 2016
President Obama just put Donald Trump in his place. After weeks of Donald Trump telling supporters the American presidential election process is rigged (it isn’t), President Obama says the Republican nominee for President of the United States should “stop whining” and focus on getting votes.

Romney was right about Russia – Obama was clueless.

Our former President said that we should have treaties with Russia, and that Russia was not a threat to the USA. (Oh, how words change!) The President was in favor of removing U.S. troops from Iraq, which, when he prematurely removed our troops from Iraq, he opened up a vacuum that ISIS filled (it is not ISIL, as the former President, and his staff, chose to say when relating to ISIS). The President criticized the Governor’s economic policies, relating them to the policies of the 1920s, yet, our country suffered greatly, economically, during the Obama administration.

Rights Of U.S. Citizens: Of Free Speech, and From Government Spying

The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming 1966 Movie

The opening video plays on humor. It’s amazing how the truth of such humor has affected the USA fifty-one years after the movie was first shown.

Consider Eric Greitens. He is the newly elected Governor of the State of Missouri. As his personal information shows, he is a former Navy SEAL, and not a man of great financial status.

Consider the life of Eric Greitens prior to his being elected to public office. As with any U.S. citizen, he was free to go anywhere around the world, and speak to anyone in any country, without any interference from our government. Limitations could have come from the nations where he traveled. Because Eric Greitens had been a member of the U.S. military, he had access to classified information, which was information that he was not allowed to share with foreign nationals, or with anyone else in our country who did not have a security clearance, or, even someone who may have had a security clearance but did not have a “need to know” of the information that Eric Greitens possessed.

Any potential candidate for public office is protected by the first and fourth amendments to our Constitution, which are a part of the Bill of Rights, which are also known as, “enumerated rights,” or personal rights against government intrusion in our lives. The key feature of the first amendment is “free speech,” whereby our government can not control our speech. The key feature of the fourth amendment, is that our government can not spy on us without probable cause.

Consider a U.S. citizen who may lead a company that has locations that are located throughout the world. The job of that person is to lead that company to financial prosperity. Such a leader may be required to discuss business dealings with any other business leader, or governmental official, regardless of the nation where that business may be located. Because this particular U.S. citizen/business leader is not an employee of the U.S. government, whether military, civilian or government contract, and has no access to classified information, there is no classified information that can be divulged to anyone else, whether American or foreigner. Therefore, such a U.S. citizen/business leader is protected by the first and fourth amendments to our constitution. That leader is free to speak without U.S. government control, and without U.S. government spying, whether that leader is in the USA or in a foreign country.

Consider our President. He was a business leader who had business holdings in the USA, and throughout the world. He had a responsibility to make his business successful. He also had the necessity to speak to business and government leaders in countries throughout the world. Because he was not an employee of the US government, or a government contract employee, and did not have access to classified information, he was free to speak to anyone, anywhere, about anything in any country of the world, with the protections of the first and fourth amendments to our constitution.

The charge against our President that he helped to “hack the 2016 election” is a charge that is an impossibility. As a candidate for office, he had nothing to do with the election process, and could have not done anything to affect the outcome of the election. The protection that we have in the USA against “hacking” our elections comes from the twelfth amendment to our constitution, which states that elections of the President and Vice-President are decided by the electoral college. The charges that our President is an illegitimate President, due to the popular vote, comes from Democrats in Congress, and from other Democrats, who should know the procedure for our election process. Even though they know, or should know, that Presidents and Vice-Presidents are elected by the electoral college, those democrats will not tell the truth to their constituents and, thereby,create great confusion in our country (I will not expound on the possible results of such confusion.) At the time that our government began spying on our “President to be,” he was not the candidate of the Republican Party. Such intrusion into his life was in defiance to the first and fourth amendments to our constitution. He should not have been the object of surveillance under the intelligence gathering resources of our former President. Such spying on members of his business or political committees was also in defiance to our constitution’s first and fourth amendments. If the tables had been turned, and if these intrusions had been forced on the life of our former President, my post would have been written in support of his constitutional rights, too. This post addresses truth, and not Trump.

The charge against our President that he “colluded” with the Russians, is also an impossibility. There is nothing that any of the other candidates, who were not government or government contract employees, could have shared with any person or any country. Such is not the case with the loser of the election. She had been an employee of the U.S. government, and had possessed a great knowledge of classified information.

There should be no surprise that the USA is a target of hostile Russian aggression. For anyone who was a member of the U.S. armed forces, during the Vietnam War era, it was a major concern that the former Soviet Union was a major threat to the peace and security of the USA. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the threat toward the USA has continued through Russia, who is the main-stay of the former Soviet Union. It appears that our former President did not take that threat seriously. It was his job to provide the necessary intelligence and security for the USA. Any hacking that took place prior to our current President taking office can only be laid at the feet of our former President. Please notice my words, “hostile Russian aggression.” I have many social media friends in the Slavic countries, to include Russia. My desire is to let those people, to include people from Russia, know that Americans are good people.

The charges against our President are just that, “charges,” with no basis of truth. Consider the following information which shows illegal surveillance of Americans during the administration of our former President; that our former President was aware of the attempt of Putin to hack our elections and yet, did nothing to protect against, and advise our nation of, the attempt to create confusion in our election process. There is also the debate between our former President, and Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney, when our former President said that Russia was not a problem for the USA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Greitens

Eric Greitens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eric Robert Greitens /ˈɡreɪtənz/ (born April 10, 1974) is an American politician, author, and former Navy SEAL currently serving as the 56th Governor of Missouri, since January 2017. He is currently the second youngest Governor in the United States, after New Hampshire’s Chris Sununu.

Born and raised in St. Louis, Greitens graduated from Parkway North High School before attending Duke University with a scholarship. After attending the University of Oxford as a Rhodes scholar and earning a D.Phil (PhD), Greitens later became a Lieutenant Commander of the Navy SEAL, serving four tours of duty around the world, commanding an Al-Qaeda targeting cell and earning a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart among other decorations. Following his military service, Greitens founded The Mission Continues, a non-profit organization serving veterans which he led until 2014. Time Magazine included him in its list of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2013.

Previously a Democrat, he announced his candidacy for governor as a Republican, campaigning on a platform centered around ethics reform. After defeating three other candidates in the Republican primaries, he faced state Attorney General and former Republican Chris Koster whom he defeated in the general election on November 8, 2016.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS: The protection of citizens from government; a wall of separation, over which government intrusion is not allowed to climb over and intrude in the lives of citizens, to include the so-called “religious” wall of separation. Government is not allowed to climb over any part of the wall that protects citizens from government into lives of citizens. It is important to remember that the Bill of Rights is the rights of citizens from the government that it put in place.

https://www.aclu.org/other/bill-rights-brief-history

THE BILL OF RIGHTS: A BRIEF HISTORY

“[A] bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse.”
– Thomas Jefferson, December 20, 1787

http://quatr.us/northamerica/after1500/government/billofrights.htm

Bill of Rights

Quatr.us> American History> Government> Bill of Rights brown paper with writing on it
Bill of Rights

April 2017 – After the leaders of the new United States wrote the Constitution, they had to get the thirteen states to agree to it. Some of the states didn’t want to agree unless they could add some specific rights for individual people. So in 1791 the United States added ten new rights to the Constitution. They got the idea for some of these rights from the Magna Carta, and for others from the Iroquois Confederacy. These are called the Bill of Rights: the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution.

These are the ten individual rights that are in the Bill of Rights, in simpler words:

The United States Congress can’t make any law about your religion, or stop you from practicing your religion, or keep you from saying whatever you want, or publishing whatever you want (like in a newspaper or a book). And Congress can’t stop you from meeting peacefully for a demonstration to ask the government to change something.

Congress can’t stop people from having and carrying weapons, because we need to be able to defend ourselves.

You don’t have to let soldiers live in your house, except if there is a war, and even then only if the United States Congress has passed a law about it.

Nobody can search your body, or your house, or your papers and things, unless they can prove to a judge that they have a good reason to think you have committed a crime.

You can’t be tried for any serious crime without a Grand Jury meeting first to decide whether there’s enough evidence for a trial. And if the jury decides you are innocent, the government can’t try again with another jury. You don’t have to say anything at your trial. You can’t be killed, or put in jail, or fined, unless you were convicted of a crime by a jury. And the government can’t take your house or your farm or anything that is yours, unless the government pays for it.

If you’re arrested, you have a right to have your trial pretty soon, and the government can’t keep you in jail without trying you. The trial has to be public, so everyone knows what is happening. The case has to be decided by a jury of ordinary people from your area. You have the right to know what you are accused of, to see and hear the people who are witnesses against you, to have the government help you get witnesses on your side, and you have the right to a lawyer to help you.

You also have the right to a jury when it is a civil case (a law case between two people rather than between you and the government).

The government can’t make you pay more than is reasonable in bail or in fines, and the government can’t order you to have cruel or unusual punishments (like torture) even if you are convicted of a crime.

Just because these rights are listed in the Constitution doesn’t mean that you don’t have other rights too.

Anything that the Constitution doesn’t say that Congress can do should be left up to the states, or to the people.

http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/bill-of-rights-and-the-amendments-to-the-constitution.php

Bill of Rights and the Amendments to The Constitution

The Ten Original Amendments: The Bill of Rights. Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The later amendments to the constitution

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;–The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;–The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a =majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified July 27, 1804.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/national-security/obama-putin-election-hacking/?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.df889e9a155e

The Washington Post – June 23, 2017

By Greg Miller, Ellen Nakashima and Adams Entous

(An article that was written about events of July 2016. Two excerpts follow. The link above will show the entire report.)

” In July, the FBI had opened an investigation of contacts between Russian officials and Trump associates.”

“At that point, the outlines of the Russian assault on the U.S. election were increasingly apparent. Hackers with ties to Russian intelligence services had been rummaging through Democratic Party computer networks, as well as some Republican systems, for more than a year. In July, the FBI had opened an investigation of contacts between Russian officials and Trump associates. And on July 22, nearly 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee were dumped online by WikiLeaks.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/20/trump-wiretap-claims-well-obama-did-secretly-spy/

Trump wiretap claims? Well, Obama did secretly spy

By Cheryl K. Chumley – The Washington Times – Monday, March 20, 2017

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Sen. Susan Collins, Republican from Maine, took to national television airwaves over the weekend to insist that President Donald Trump explain why he decided it was OK to accuse Barack Obama of wiretapping his conversations in Trump Tower.

Here, let me help: Because Obama’s White House was tapping into people all the time.
Are memories that short?

From May 2013, an NPR report: “The Associated Press is protesting what it calls a massive and unprecedented intrusion into its gathering of news. The target of that wrath is the U.S. Justice Department, which secretly collected phone records for several AP reporters last year.”

That was when Eric Holder was attorney general of the United States.

And as an attorney for the AP said at the time, the Justice Department’s collection of data included phone records — both home-based and cellphone — of AP reporters in Hartford, New York, Washington, and the U.S. House of Representatives.

The records of roughly 20 different telephone lines spanned the April-May 2012 time period, and roped in 20 or so different phones.

Then look at this, also from May 2013, from the Washington Post: “Journalists, First Amendment watchdogs and government transparency advocates reacted with outrage Monday to the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the news gathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks.”

And just who was that Fox News personality?

James Rosen, the cable outlet’s chief Washington correspondent.
“It was downright chilling,” said Fox News executive Michael Clemente in a statement, of the government’s attempt to seize Rosen’s emails.

That’s just two surveillance operations on innocent Americans — members of the press, no less — from Team Obama.
But let’s not forget Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS correspondent whose critical reports on the Obama administration’s handling of Fast and Furious and of Benghazi more than likely irked.

Attkisson, in 2015, sued the Justice Department, outright alleging the Obama administration had illegally hacked into her computer to secretly monitor her work. Justice denied — but it was a straddle-the-line type of denial.
“To our knowledge,” the agency said in a statement in 2013, after Attkisson went public with her accusations, “the Justice Department has never compromised Ms. Attkisson’s computers.”

It’s the “to our knowledge” that leaves open the doors. It’s just so easy to slide into the category of “yes, we did, but we had no knowledge of that.” Kind of like when Lois Lerner of Internal Revenue Service scandal fame — you know, when the IRS was found to have delayed nonprofit applications for tea party groups seen as unfriendly to Team Obama’s reelection efforts? — said she had no knowledge of what went on beneath her watch.
So Trump under surveillance by Team Obama at Trump Tower?
It’s hardly crazy talk.

“I don’t know the basis for President Trump’s assertion,” Collins said, during a “Meet the Press” appearance on NBC. “And that’s what I wish he would explain to us on the Intelligence Committee and to the American people. And I do believe he owes us that explanation.”

Quite right. But let’s be real here. The notion of Obama and his supporters putting an American under surveillance for personal and political reasons is not a left-field thought. Really, considering the history of the previous White House, and all the secret surveillance that went on during those eight years, it would actually prove more surprising to find out Trump wasn’t placed under watch by Obama teammates and cheerleaders.
Trump’s claims may be unfounded; may be proven. But in the end, the bigger story is this: Obama’s presidency tapped into citizens’ private information all the time. Isn’t that, more than Trump’s accusations, cause for more concern?

Romney & Obama on Russia during the 2012 Presidential Debate

Democrats hit Obama’s failure to counter Russian election meddling
Top Democrat says Obama should have done more to counter foreign interference

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/25/adam-schiff-obama-made-very-serious-mistake-russia/

By Valerie Richardson – The Washington Times – Sunday, June 25, 2017

It was the Democratic Party’s turn Sunday to sweat over Russian meddling as lawmakers acknowledged that President Barack Obama knew about the foreign election interference but failed to act until after the 2016 presidential race.
Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said the Obama administration should have done more to counter Russian interference, blaming election-year politics for what he described as “a very serious mistake.”

“The American people needed to know, and I didn’t think it was enough to tell them after the election but rather given the seriousness of this, I think the administration needed to call out Russia earlier and needed to act to deter and punish Russia earlier, and I think that was a very serious mistake,” said the California Democrat on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
(click onto the link to see the complete news article)

It should be noted that while I was doing research for this post, by searching for significant names, my computer locked up and was difficult for me to get it working again. Not long ago, as I was composing a similar post, using significant names, my computer also locked up. On that occasion, I had to ask my internet company to get my computer working again. There are email providers that have blocked my emails when significant names were written in the subject line of the letters. Are these “matters” of coincidence?

John 8:32. ” you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

Consider Easy Access

Click onto any highlighted word to see the videos and text on the blog.

Where Were You When The World Stopped Turning?

It was during the Democrat Bill Clinton presidency that 911 Islamic hijackers were allowed easy entry into the United States Of America. Consider the following documentation that explains that process, and the things that should have been done to keep the 911 hijackers out of the USA. Consider the Democrat party of today, as it opposes the actions of our President to protect our country from similar attacks on our nation. Consider also, how important it is for the USA to provide vigorous vetting of people who want to come to our nation from countries that have a history of aggression toward the USA. No resident of any foreign country has a right to enter the USA. It is a privilege for potential immigrants to come to America, for peaceful purposes. In order for the USA to be protected from acts of terrorism, defensive measures must be established without alerting enemies of such measures. In essence, “don’t tell your enemy what you’re going to do, and don’t tell your enemy what you’re not going to do.” Do not give your enemy any advanced notice of anything that you are going to do in relation to your protective measure that may, or may not, be taken against your enemy. The authorities, who are charged with keeping terrorists out of our country, have to be right each and every time. Terrorists need to be right, “only one time,” for thousands of innocent people in America to lose their lives. Unfortunately, too many Americans seem to have forgotten the events of that horrible day of “911.” Consider this thought. If you were to be given a box containing one hundred snakes, and if only one of the snakes would be venomous, would you turn the snakes loose in your home? This post comes from one that was posted on this blog on April 6, 2015. Almost all of the information that is provided now, is the same as that which was posted in 2015. Notice in one of the videos, a picture of the driver’s license that was issued to Mohamed Atta by the State of Florida.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Atta

Mohamed Atta

Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta (Arabic: محمد محمد الأمير عوض السيد عطا‎‎ Muḥammad Muḥammad al-Amir ‘Awaḍ as-Sayyid ‘Aṭā [mæˈħæmmæd elʔæˈmiːɾ ˈʕɑwɑdˤ esˈsæj.jed ˈʕɑtˤɑ]; September 1, 1968 – September 11, 2001) was an Egyptian hijacker and one of the ringleaders in the September 11 attacks who served as the hijacker-pilot of American Airlines Flight 11, crashing the plane into the North Tower of the World Trade Center as part of the coordinated attacks.[1][2][3][4][5] At 33 years of age, he was the oldest hijacker to participate in the attacks.

In the United States

On March 22, 2000, while still in Germany, Mohamed Atta sent an e-mail to the Academy of Lakeland in Florida, inquiring about flight training, “Dear sir, we are a small group of young men from different Arab countries. Now, we are living in Germany since a while for study purposes. We would like to start training for the career of airline professional pilots. In this field, we haven’t yet any knowledge but we are ready to undergo an intensive training program (up to ATP and eventually higher).” Atta sent 50–60 similar e-mails to other flight training schools in the United States.[55]

On May 17, Mohamed Atta applied for a United States visa, receiving a five-year B-1/B-2 (tourist/business) visa the next day from the United States embassy in Berlin. Because Atta had lived in Germany for approximately five years, along with his “strong record as a student”, he was treated favorably and not scrutinized.[56] After obtaining his visa, Atta took a bus on June 2 from Germany to Prague where he stayed overnight before traveling on to the United States the next day. Bin al-Shibh later explained that they believed it would contribute to operational security for Atta to fly out of Prague instead of Hamburg, where he traveled from previously. Likewise, Shehhi traveled from a different location, in his case via Brussels.[57][58]

There are key dates in American history that will never be forgotten. December 7, 1941, was the day that the United States was attacked by the nation of Japan, which led our nation into the second world war. On that day 2,403 Americans died in the attack. November 22, 1963 was the day that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. September 11, 2001 – 911 – There were 2,996 people killed and more than 6,000 others wounded. 911 was a day that most Americans will never forget. It was a cool Autumn day, and I had just walked into a business office in a small southern town. As soon as I entered the front door, I noticed people whose eyes were trained on a small tv. There was a replay of an airliner that had just crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. Not much was known about what was happening. I decided to leave for a while, so I drove to a nearby convenience store. A few men were talking about what had happened at the WTC, and they thought that it was just an accident. Then, a second airliner crashed into the South Tower of the WTC. At that moment, everybody knew that no accidents had taken place. Within the same hour two other hijacked airliners would crash, with one going into the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the other into a field in southwestern Pennsylvania, near the city of Shanksville.

On the following Sunday, much of American found itself in a church somewhere. Although, God was welcomed back in much of America, Jesus certainly was not! But, a lot of prayers were said, and many of them to a lifeless and generic deity. You know that type. He’s a feeble old man with a long pointed beard, and uncombed, thinning and graying hair. He wears some kind of burlap sack robe. This “god” sits on a stool, watching over America and the world, and gives out blessings..but, no curses. He’s the kind of god who does nothing but good for people who do good, and does bad for people, based on a sliding scale of whatever the world’s population thinks is bad. Of course, we’ve been made to believe that abortion on demand, homosexual marriage and a mistreatment of Israel are all good things. So, 911, which was really bad, and which everybody believed was really bad, was a time in history that God had no choice in the matter but to agree with the world’s vote.

The hijackers of those four airliners lived in normal American neighborhoods, and took flight training at normal American flight training schools. Each of the four pilot hijackers had Florida driver’s licenses. All of the nineteen hijackers had drivers licenses that had been issued in thirty states. The hijackers were Muslims. Liberal democrat states have been all too eager to provide drivers licenses for illegal aliens; the term is not “undocumented.” A person in our country is here, either, legally or illegally.

The people who were killed on 911 lost their lives at the hands of the 19 hijackers. At various places around the world, as well as in the USA, Muslims celebrated the deaths of Americans who died in the hijackings. Videos will follow my comments, and will address the things that I have mentioned, as they relate to victims and murderers. Heroes are mentioned, with there being too many to identify, at the risk of not listing all of the heroes. Radio conversations and personal interviews make the events of 911 even more significant.

On 911, much of America was much like all of the rest of America. We were all hurting. We didn’t hear airplanes in the sky for the two following days. We didn’t know if another attack might occur here in America, or elsewhere around the globe. Our President did what he could to protect our country. At this time, 15 years later, I don’t think that a lot of Americans feel like they are safe from “enemies foreign and domestic.” I know that I don’t feel safe. In my previous post there are many things that are stated about Radical Islam that should be studied and shared with members of our Congress. Our country has been acting like the frog that was placed in a simmering saucepan of water. As the water simmered, the frog became comfortable just sitting in the “nice warm water.” In time, the water became warmer, then hotter, until the frog was boiled to death. America is in the process of simmering to death because of its lack of focus on the goals which Islam has stated to take control of our country. I have heard Muslims of various ages being interviewed about Sharia Law, and all of them have been in agreement that our country should be under that law. Our nation needs to wake up to such an attack on our legal system. The hijackers of 911 were not Christians, Jews, Hindus or Tea Party members; they were Muslims. Muslims need to get their house in order. Should we think that radical Muslims have changed their goals since 911? Are “peaceful” Muslims trying to control those who are “not of peace?” Can radical Muslims cross over our southern borders of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California and attack unsuspecting Americans in those areas, and then move northward into other parts of our nation to murder more Americans? You should think about that question.

Two videos that were made that will close this post. The first video deals with “A Small Town Southern Man.” That man loved Jesus, and he loved his country. He was faithful to his wife and family, and worked hard to take care of them. Small southern towns are close-knit communities. Their people are patriotic, and stand at attention and cross their hearts when “Old Glory” passes by. They take their hats off when a funeral procession passes by. They say “yes sir” and “yes ma’am” to their elders, and even to other people who may not be of older age. They remember that Thanksgiving is a time that the pilgrims gave thanks to God. They remember the birth of Jesus, as well as His death, burial and resurrection. It really sounds like I’m talking about most American cities. By the way, Bill O’Reilly said that 80 per cent of all Americans say that they are Christians. So, with all of that common ground, I am going to give the song, “Small Town Southern Man,” a new title that is more appropriate for our nation. I’m going to call it, “Any Town American Man.” I really don’t think that Alan Jackson will mind this one-time liberty. The final song is by Lee Greenwood. It should remind us that we need leaders in Washington, DC, and in our state houses, who will protect our nation.” I trust that our nation will never lose the simple, yet important, things of faith, family and freedom.

For the hijackers of 911, and all others of the same spiritual mindset, the following scripture is a serious warning.

Revelation 20:11-15 New King James Version (NKJV)

The Great White Throne Judgment

11 Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. 13 The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works. 14 Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.

The Final Call From Fllight 93
Story Of Todd Beamer’s “Let’s Roll”

Their Final Journey: 911

Brigette Gabriel And Bill O’Reilly Slam Islam

Muslims From London

Muslims Celebrate 9-11 Attacks On America

I Believe – A 9/11 Tribute

United Airlines Flight 93 ATC Audio

Mohamed Atta’s Message From The Cockpit Of American 11

9/11 Tapes Show Air Traffic Horror

9/11 September 11 ATC Air Traffic Control Recordings
Flight 11, Flight 175, Flight 77 and Flight 93

September 11th Airspace Shutdown

This Is What Islam Does – The Horror Of Muslim Attacks On Iraqi Christians

9/11 Audiotape Of Firefighters Last Moments

World Trade Center 911 Call MSNBC 9-13-01

Small Town Southern Man by Alan Jackson

God Bless The U.S.A. by Lee Greenwood

Teach Your Children – Government

Click onto a highlighted word to see the videos and text on the blog.

Our House

Teach Your Children

The opening songs relate to homes and families. A man and woman become “husband and wife.” They move into a home, and “they have children.” The responsibilities that follow are far beyond those that most young couples can even imagine. The seriousness of preparing children for adulthood and parenting their own children can not be understated. Education is a matter of importance for all parents. Today, there is a serious problem in government education that seems to be just as pronounced as an elephant in the refrigerator; it just won’t seem to go away!

The following video shows young people of college age. As they are being interviewed they are asked simple questions that relate to the founding of the USA. Amazingly enough, the great majority of those who were interviewed had no idea of the beginnings of the USA. It is shocking to think that those college students are voters, and are ill-equipped to take on such an important role in society. Watch the video, and we will continue with this discussion.

Jessie Watters Questions College Students About American History

The United States Department of Education (DOE) was created in 1979 during the Carter (Democrat) Administration, and was made active in 1980. The DOE is an agency of the U.S. government that is at “cabinet level,” which means that each President appoints someone who will be its leader. The DOE leader is confirmed by the Senate, and is directly responsible to the President. Because the appointment is of a political nature, the mindset of the President finds its way into the mind and operation of the DOE Secretary. It is common knowledge that Democrat presidents favor abortion on demand and same-sex marriage, as well as other liberal beliefs that will find their way into the day-to-day operation of the DOE, and of all other cabinet level departments of government. The following link will provide a more detailed fact list that relates to the DOE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education
The United States Department of Education (ED or DoED), also referred to as the ED for (the) Education Department, is a Cabinet-level department of the United States government. Recreated by the Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88) and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979, it began operating on May 4, 1980.[2]
The Department of Education Organization Act divided the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services. The Department of Education is administered by the United States Secretary of Education. It has approximately 4,400 employees and an annual budget of $68 billion (2016).[1]

The success of the Department of Education is less than stellar. The information that follows is quite shocking, in that it shows that performances of high school SAT scores have not improved, but have gotten worse since the DOE became operational and began to set the course of education for the public schools in the USA.

The categories of comparison are: Critical Reading, Mathematics and Writing, and are shown from 1981-2016. The scores are also shown for 1967. The scores are based on Male, Female and the average of Male and Female. There is no such category as “non-gender specific,” or any of the other “additives” that came about during the Obama (Democrat) administration. Imagine what it will be like for the proper grading of these scores in the future, with possibly never-ending category types of sex types of students. (Don’t say “gender!” It is the “sex of the student” that our schools have used for many years for student types. Check the word “sex” in the Websters New World Dictionary Of The American Language College Edition,1964 edition.) Consider the following SAT scores:

Critical Reading. 1967 – 543; 1980/81 – 502; 1991 – 499; 2001 – 506; 2011 – 497; 2016 – 494.
Mathematics. 1967 – 516; 1980-81 – 492; 1991 – 500; 2001 – 514; 2011 – 514; 2016 – 508.

Consider all of the tax money that has been poured into the Department of Education. Ask yourself, “why!” And,”why are we offering our children on the altars of government schools?”

http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/historical-average-SAT-scores.pdf
PDF]Average SAT Scores of College-Bound Seniors – ErikTheRed.com
http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/historical-average-SAT-scores.pdf
erikthered.com/tutor. Average SAT Scores of College-Bound Seniors (1952 – present). SAT (old scale). Class Year. Critical Reading. Mathematics. Verbal.It

It is the responsibility of parents to provide for the care of their children. God’s Word states that parents have the responsibility to prepare their children for an education of God’s Word. Because the DOE has done such a poor job of educating our children, parents must become greatly involved in the education of their children. There are many parents who, themselves, grew up and received “a government education,” which is really a poor example of an education. Still, all parents are responsible for the education of their children.

Deuteronomy 6:4-8 New King James Version (NKJV)

4 “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one! 5 You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength.

6 “And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. 7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up. 8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.

6:7 teach them diligently to your children. The commandments were to be the subject of conversation, both inside and outside the home, from the beginning of the day to its end.(MacArthur Study Bible)

God’s instruction to the parents of the children of Israel was to “teach your children.” That process of instruction was, and is, an ongoing process. The law was given to the Jews in order for them to become a holy and righteous people, to bring a Holy and Righteous Messiah into the world. The importance of effectively teaching our children has never been greater than it is now.

Please follow this blog. Select the category of Government to see other posts of this nature.